You are currently viewing European court policies ‘gay cake’ situation inadmissible

European Court of Human Rights - Getty

< div class="inline_image image_size_full" data-attachment =" 253812 "data-sequence =" 1" readability =" 6 ">< img alt =" European Court of Human Rights -Getty" src ="" dimensions ="( max-width: 1023px) 100vw, 780px" class =" lazyload" size =" 2121" elevation =" 1414 "srcset =" 480w, 600w, 780w "> A gay legal rights protestor has lost a seven-year discrimination situation over a cake order with a Belfast bakery after the European Court of Human Rights( ECHR) ruled his situation as inadmissible. Gareth Lee started lawsuit in 2014 against Ashers Baking Company in Northern Ireland after business refused to make a cake illustrating popular kids’s TV program Sesame Street personalities Bert and also Ernie, the logo of LGBT organisation Queerspace and the slogan ‘Support Gay Marriage’.

He paid beforehand but was called by the bakeshop soon after to state it would not meet his order because of the owners’ Christian beliefs. Lee was refunded.

The ruling on the application, which was lodged with the ECHR on 3 April 2019, stated that Lee had “stopped working to exhaust residential solutions” and also therefore was inadmissible.

” The applicant had actually not invoked his Convention civil liberties at any kind of factor in the residential proceedings. By depending solely on residential legislation, the applicant had actually denied the domestic courts of the possibility to address any Convention concerns increased, rather asking the Court to take over the function of the domestic courts,” the ECHR specified.

Case history

The long-running situation, which has actually been referred to as the ‘gay cake’ legend, has been back and forth with rulings in favour of both celebrations throughout the years. The area court initially found that the failure to fulfil the order had been straight discrimination on the grounds of the applicant’s sexual preference as well as his religions or political point of views which breached the Fair Employment and also Treatment (Northern Ireland) Order 1998 as well as the Equality Act (Sexual Orientation) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2006.

This choice was supported by the Court of Appeal which kept in mind that bakers were not allowed to provide a solution only to people that agreed with their religious beliefs.

This was rescinded by the Supreme Court which discovered that the bakeshop owners had actually not refused to serve Lee because he was gay, yet rather since they objected to being needed to advertise a message that they exceptionally disagreed with.


Lee claimed he had “very much expected a various end result”. “I am most distressed that the core issues did not obtain rather analysed and adjudicated upon because of a formality. None of us ought to be anticipated to need to determine the beliefs of a business’s owners before going into their shop or paying for their services.”

Ciaran Moynagh of Phoenix Law, which stood for Mr Lee, stated “we will now consider whether a fresh residential case is proceeded”.